Joel
The light bulb came on early this morning and I think I know what you mean.
When I was writing about Shadow Adjustment Technology (SAT), I was not thinking
about the camera's adjustment of shutter or aperture. I meant that RAW files,
as read by Aperture, will not include the settings for sharpening, contrast or
saturation etc ...
I don't know if SAT adjusts shutter or aperture, but the effect of that change
would be obvious in Aperture's preview images.
Chris
On 15 Jan 2010, at 15:15, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm only guessing, Joel, partly based on what we have discussed before on
>> the List.
>>
>> The application in which you open the RAW file must make assumptions about
>> how to present the image. From what you say, and it sounds logical, Studio
>> and Master take account of the image settings in the Oly camera, perhaps the
>> ones used to generate a jpg. Without having checked, I supposed that
>> Aperture doesn't even see these settings, but makes a guess at how it should
>> be presented for viewing and subsequent processing. I should say that
>> Aperture treats all RAW files the same when making a preview and that's what
>> I mean by "neutral".
>>
>> What do you think? I shall do some experiments with jpg and RAF files in an
>> E-3 over the weekend.
>
> I think it might be like saying that a Pentax lens on an E-system
> camera via adapter is more neutral than a DZ because the DZ applies AF
> and aperture settings.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|