Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM ) Full moon on candid camera

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Full moon on candid camera
From: Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:56:21 +0100
I did not forget the aperture, I am 100% sure it was 2.8. There might have been 
some haze, or else my GF-1 is good at dealing with highlights.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://wajsman.smugmug.com
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog




On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> The exposure guideline for the full moon (which is illuminated by full 
> sun) is 1 stop less than the sunny 16 rule... call it moony 11?
> 
> Nathan's exposure is already almost 2 stops over that so there was 
> presumably a lot of haze or else he forgot the actual aperture.  Chris' 
> exposure is way more than that.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> That's way too much exposure, Chris. My moon image was shot at ISO
>> 100, 1/320 sec. at f2.8 (the aperture is not in the exif but I
>> remember having the 90mm Elmarit wide open).
>> 
>> Cheers, Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu 
>> http://wajsman.smugmug.com http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> 
>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog:
>> http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> 
>>> I had a go and got nothing like Brian's excellent result.  My
>>> efforts resulted in a large round blown highlight -- ƒ4, 1/6,
>>> ISO400 with a 50-200 on my E-3.  I was impressed with the IS, but
>>> not the banded noise when I tried to raise the shadows.
>>> 
>>> I shall have to re-think this exposure lark.
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 1 Feb 2010, at 01:49, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Nice indeed. Cool use of the Z. 75-150.   I too liked Nathan's
>>>> shots as well.  It was a special Wolf moon--right at its
>>>> perigee--thus 14% larger and 30% brighter. I thought about going
>>>> out and giving it a go, (five seconds)  but it was windy and in
>>>> the single digits.  Glad others did a nice job.  Oh, always
>>>> thought the moon looked larger at the horizon, but that is 
>>>> apparently an illusion.
>>> -- 
>>> _________________________________________________________________ 
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus 
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ 
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz