Hey buster, whose nose are you calling "full-frame"?
Strictly 16:9 in the proboscis stakes here.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: Jez Cunningham [mailto:jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 02 March 2010 14:41
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,
But it's being 1m from the subject that distorts perspective. What you'll
get is a crop out of the centre of the huge full-frame nose.
Jez
On 2 March 2010 14:36, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A 20mm wide angle probably would, John, but this isn't a 20mm wide
> angle, rather something close to a standard lens. Remember it's being
> used on a micro four thirds body.
>
> --
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hudson [mailto:OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 March 2010 13:03
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,
>
>
> Wouldn't a 20mm lens at one meter from the upper torso and head
> generate a hugely distorted nose in the final image ?
>
> I was taught that wide angles up close is not a preferred choice for
> portrait photography.
>
> jh
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|