Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,

[Andrew Fildes]

I wasn't - I was comparing the 70-300mm to the 50-200mm.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 02/03/2010, at 10:54 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> Interesting.  I don't think I would know how to compare a 20mm to a
> 50-200mm.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Andrew Fildes wrote:
>> I just threw up a gallery here after wandering around Sydney  
>> (Circular
>> Quay) a couple of weeks ago.
>> http://www.pbase.com/afildes/ep2_sydney
>> All with the Panasonic 20mm except the bottom row with the 70-300mm,
>> shot through my hotel room window. I continue to be impressed with
>> this lens. A friend I saw last Sunday claims that it is better than
>> the 50-200mm SWD he just bought (I suggested he send that one back  
>> for
>> another example).
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/