Re: [OM] Certainly a beaten subject already,

[Chuck Norcutt]

That's worse.  Now I have to admit to not being able to read.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Andrew Fildes wrote:
> I wasn't - I was comparing the 70-300mm to the 50-200mm.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> On 02/03/2010, at 10:54 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 
>> Interesting.  I don't think I would know how to compare a 20mm to a
>> 50-200mm.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Andrew Fildes wrote:
>>> I just threw up a gallery here after wandering around Sydney  
>>> (Circular
>>> Quay) a couple of weeks ago.
>>> http://www.pbase.com/afildes/ep2_sydney
>>> All with the Panasonic 20mm except the bottom row with the 70-300mm,
>>> shot through my hotel room window. I continue to be impressed with
>>> this lens. A friend I saw last Sunday claims that it is better than
>>> the 50-200mm SWD he just bought (I suggested he send that one back  
>>> for
>>> another example).
>> -- 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/