I am sure you don't mean this the way it comes across, but it's really a bit
harsh. Your opinions about the price/performance relationship of these and
other cameras are well known, and don't need to spill over into insulting
unknown numbers of non-bragging list members.
This is a list where OM-3Ti owners have been known to give them away to
other members who's work they feel merits them. I don't remember any of
them bragging about it.
Tom
(Neither current holder, giver, or recipient of a 3-Ti. I once had a 3, and
I very much liked it, although it's long gone to another home. There were
significant differences in use to a 4, which itself might be thought of as
an over-complicated and over-priced gimmicky version of the honest
journeymans' OM1 if you felt like it and it fitted your predjudices...)
On 10 March 2010 09:47, Chris Crawford wrote:
> Exactly. The only reason people on the list who have them brag so much is
> the high price. The camera is basically a mechanical OM-4T at 3 times the
> price (at the normal going rate, not the VERY inflated price on this ebay
> sale we're discussing). If I had the money I'd get the 35-80 f2.8 lens
> instead. I have three OM-4T bodies, don't need another OM.
>
>
> --
> Chris Crawford
> Fine Art Photography
> Fort Wayne, Indiana
> 260-424-0897
>
> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
>
> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|