| Subject: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:16:42 -0500 |
> > Hmm, maybe I should forget it. > Personally, I think the 200/4 is a much nicer lens in every way than the 200/5. But that's me. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Occasional Friday Flower - Jim N., Ken Norton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2010, Brian Swale |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits, Nicolas Mitchell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OMZ 200/5 and HK Flower Portraits, C.H.Ling |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |