I guess my "best" solution is to choose my subjects more carefully.
Thanks for the feedback.
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Dude - Who stole my 0.56ms?
> On 4/9/2010 4:17 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> The thing that confounds me, with macro lenses, and I should have
>> expected this from the start, is that as one moves in closer to the
>> subject, the DOF decreases to a ridiculous point.
> It's just "do the math" physics. There are some new and very different
> imaging concepts being worked on that may change DOF possibilities, but
> as long as we stick to simple refraction based lenses, the rules are
>> My Leica Elmarit-R 60/2.8 Macro lens requires stopping down to a minimum
>> opening in order to get the full subject in focus. I'm sure this is fine
>> for flat subjects, but just doesn't work out for me, particularly with
> One relatively recent change is DOF stacking software. You take a series
> of shots with the plane of focus moved in small increments. The software
> merges the sharp parts. I've been meaning to try that, but have by now
> forgotten the names of the apps. I do have a handful of sets of images
> that may work.
> I think one trick is to use a focusing rail, rather than refocusing the
> lens. That way, he in focus part of each 'slice' is the same
> magnification, so there is less size matching for the software to do.
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/