Re: [OM] Odd marks and 100/2

Subject: Re: [OM] Odd marks and 100/2
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:07:48 +0800
I haven't use the 100/2 enough to say how it performs in various situations, 
on the field I found it is harder to confirm focus than 90/2 and 180/2.8 but 
when carefully tested, 100/2 has slightly better center resolution than 90/2 
(while 90/2 has much better edge to edge performance). Here is a sample from 
100/2 at F2.8 (sorry for the shallow DOF):

http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2061.JPG (~3.5MB)

Here what really amazing could be the model :-)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nicholas Herndon"

> As for the OMZ 100/2, I'm okay with paying the "spousal tax" (ha!).
> I've heard so many great things about this lens, and seen so many
> amazing photos taken with it (I'm looking at you CH) that I figure
> it's worth the hassle of putting some of my other OMZs back into
> circulation.

Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>