My take also. I don't understand the why and Shaw doesn't really say
other to comment on changing focal lengths. But I don't believe his
results are in error... nor do I think they are specific to the
particular pieces of equipment he used. He attributes these results to
the generic equipment arrangements.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> On 4/22/2010 3:41 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> and even made it into print (pg 74 JS first macro book)
>
> I'm not ready to dismiss Shaw's results without further consideration,as
> they appear at first glance to be the result of empirical observation
> and he seems to be fairly careful as experimenter and observer.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|