>Do you seriously believe that your lab would review and correct your C41
negatives for those "hair" problems ?
Yes, I seriously believe they would. My lab is a one man operation
and he takes a lot of pride in his work. His prices are a little
higher than your typical Walgreens/CVS/Longs Drugs and he doesn't do
one hour developing, but the quality of his work is outstanding.
|> I haven't use the 100/2 enough to say how it performs in various situations,
> on the field I found it is harder to confirm focus than 90/2 and 180/2.8 but
> when carefully tested, 100/2 has slightly better center resolution than 90/2
> (while 90/2 has much better edge to edge performance). Here is a sample from
> 100/2 at F2.8 (sorry for the shallow DOF):
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2061.JPG (~3.5MB)
>
> Here what really amazing could be the model :-)
>
> C.H.Ling
Thanks for that example, C.H.--what is really amazing is the
background separation and the bokeh with a notoriously difficult
background. Very smooth. And the sharpness nearly wide open.
Amazing!
Kari, you'll love that 28/2. It's one of my favorites! Please give
us an update and examples once you've used it more.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
