Actually, I'm not sure what I meant. I was thinking of the difference
of which parts of the emulsion get washed away between developed
positive and negative films. But my comment doesn't make any sense.
Chuck Norcutt
Dawid Loubser wrote:
> Chuck, I think you meant "underexposure with negative film" ?
>
> And yes, Brian, if you have any "complaints" about the E-3
> (a wonderful camera) I'll gladly "relive you" of this pain
> if you want to donate it to me :-)
> Dawid
>
> On 03 May 2010, at 3:24 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Also not to start another conflagration but we keep trying to tell you
>> that overexposure with negative film leads to loss of shadow detail.
>> Overexposure of slide film or digital images (both are positive) leads
>> to blown highlights. When using digital you have to be more cautious
>> about overexposure just as you have to be more cautious about
>> underexposure with negative film.
>>
>> If you're consistently getting blown highlights with the E-3 why not
>> simply dial in a -1/3 or -2/3 exposure compensation. The camera also
>> has a histogram and flashing warnings about exposure problems if
>> you'll
>> but use them. The E-3 is not the same as negative film and you need
>> to
>> adapt to the different tool rather than complain about it.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|