I shouldn't have thought so, Chuck. It looked like a very good deal, but it's
a different system for someone like me.
I will have a look at my 3 interchangeable-lens cameras in the way you suggest;
I have always recognised that the SWF is a way of mitigating sensor dust and is
unlikely to eliminate it completely.
Chris
On 9 May 2010, at 22:16, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I hope that none of my comments about the sensor dust caused anyone to
> be turned off from what I had clearly stated I thought to be a good
> deal. The sensor had some dust but it was inconsequential for shooting
> at f/11 or wider and probably for most normal photography at f/16 or
> even f/22 where it would likely not be noticed.
>
> Chris's statement about checking his image at 200% for dust before
> sending it off only told me that he may not know how to critically
> evaluate the sensor for dust. His shot may look just fine yet still
> show the amount of dust shown on the 5D shot when critically tested
> against an out of focus image of a clear blue sky at small apertures.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|