Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Incident Light metering

Subject: Re: [OM] Incident Light metering
From: "Sue Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 20:44:29 -0500
It's a hard lesson to learn. I used only an old minolta autometer when I was 
shooting film, and it never failed me, although it had an appetite for 
batteries. There is no easier, more accurate way to meter, I never used the 
spot meter on my OM4.

Bill pearce
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Hudson" <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Incident Light metering


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Dawid Loubser" <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 5:37 AM
> Subject: [OM] Incident Light metering
>
>
>> An incident light meter simply cannot be equalled by any other in-
>> camera reflected-light
>
> ****SHIT !!!
>
>
> jh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> metering solution, no matter what it does. This is in terms of
>> "accuracy". However, modern
>> multi-segment light meters with powerful CPUs and a database of
>> reference images, like
>> that found in the Nikon F6, are probably best at maximising the
>> captured dynamic range,
>> especially on slide film.
>>
>> I never shoot slide film without incident light metering (of course, I
>> never shoot slide
>> film in anything but non-metered medium format cameras, but you get
>> the point). Even when
>> you go to extremely low light levels, such as this shot I made (18
>> minute exposure at f/32,
>> very high contrast captured on a poor-latitude slide film) no in-
>> camera meter could ever
>> accurately meter it with the same confidence, you'd always have to
>> fiddle around with
>> multi-spot this, exposure-compensation-that, etc.
>>
>> http://snipurl.com/w5ux5
>>
>> I'm not saying it can't be done, I'm just saying that an incident
>> meter meters it *exactly*
>> for how it should be exposed, no additional brain-power required.
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>>
>> On 12 May 2010, at 4:38 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>>
>>> It's a hard subject to meter.  An incident light meter would be nice.
>>> But if I have an OM-4 in my hands I always think "I don't need no
>>> stinking incident light meter."
>>
>> -- 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>> signature database 5110 (20100512) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
> signature database 5110 (20100512) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2869 - Release Date: 05/12/10 
06:26:00

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz