Re: [OM] wahoo!

[Andrew Fildes]

Don't worry - it hasn't happened because it deleted it before I did it.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 30/05/2010, at 9:39 PM, Chris Barker wrote:

> It might have implied that, but for the "already", which made it  
> vague in time and therefore deserving of perfect(ion).
>
> Chris
>
> On 30 May 2010, at 11:22, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>> But each tense here has existential ramifications -
>> Am I presently deleting what I might or intend to do. Or will I? Or
>> should I have done it if I were to wish to?
>> The past implied a time paradox rather nicely I thought.
>> Andrew Fildes
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/