On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Different strokes, different folks...
Well, there's always that ...
> I personally do batch processing more often than not. The advantage to
> Lightroom and Capture One is the ability to apply a batch setting to
> multiple images and then tweak individual shots from there. You get to
> A-B compare images and adjust as necessary the individuals to correct
> for some oddity that snuck in. Once you get things "close enough" just
> tell it to develop the whole mess. If I take 20 pictures of something
> and want every single image to match, a tool like Lightroom or Capture
> One is invaluable.
I realize that. But that wasn't what I was looking at, apples to
apples. CaptureOne is *supposed* to have something that puts it in a
category beyond the other converters, including Studio, with respect
to color/exposure/all-round good looks. I had thought you had claimed
this yourself. But when I mess with it, I can't come up with the
goods. It's a fraud. I'm calling the cops!
As to batch processing -- I defer to you I use batch actions to
resize a bunch of images for the web. That's about it..
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|