Excellent bokeh on both but the first flower is not quite in focus.
Chuck Norcutt
Wayne Harridge wrote:
> Different conditions, different film, different lens - Zuiko 50/1.4 black
> nose s/n 783xxx @f1.4 Fuji superia x-tra 400
>
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com/images/cn35-1117-29-a.jpg
>
>
> Now for something completely different - Leitz Elmar 135/4 enlarging lens on
> bellows, probably around f8, Fuji superia x-tra 400
>
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com/images/cn35-1091-10-a.jpg
>
> I dunno what conclusions you can draw but what the hell !
>
> ...Wayne
>
> Wayne Harridge
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com/
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ken Norton [mailto:ken@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Saturday, 3 July 2010 10:31 AM
>> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
>> Subject: [OM] Good Bokeh, Bad Bokeh, Drawing a Confession from the
>> Guilty
>>
>> In a feeble attempt to clearly illustrate what Moose is droning on and
>> on about with Bokeh vs. Focus Blurring, I posted a new photograph up
>> on www.zone-10.com
>>
>> May the nashing of teeth begin.
>>
>> (personally, I think the problem is that this particular lens is a
>> black-nosed one that that's why the picture looks so bad).
>>
>> AG Schnozz
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
