Oops! Plastic vs metal, eh?
Chuck Norcutt
Piers Hemy wrote:
> As best I recall, David, MMF-1 and MMF-2 are functionally identical, one has
> a plastic body, the other metal. I guess that MMF-1 is the metal one.
>
> And they are both functionally identical to the Panasonic adaptor.
>
> But you need to be sure that the 4/3 lenses you fit on the micro 4/3 body
> are AF-capable on the body - as far as I know the ZD50 does not support
> contrast-detect AF, and thus is not fully AF-capable on the micro4/3 bodies,
> but others with experience may know better.
>
> See the chart here: http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/43/lenses.html
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Irisarri [mailto:zuiko3000@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 15 August 2010 09:26
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: [OM] Panasonic DMW-MA1 vs Olympus MMF-1 vs MMF-2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have just bought a PEN camera and I want to use my ZD 50mm f2 lens on it
> using an adapter. The Olympus MMF-1 is really expensive comparing it with
> the Panasonic DMW-MA1 adapter.
>
> Amazon prices are:
>
> Panasonic DMW-MA1 $104.95
> Olympus MMF-1 $210
> Olympus MMF-2 $130
>
> What´s the difference between MMF-1 and MMF-2? There isn´t any information
> available. Maybe the latter hasn´t got gold connectors. is there any
> difference using the Panasonic DMW-MA1 adapter with the PEN camera and ZD
> 50mm f2?
>
> Where can I find a compatibility list of fourthirds lenses with MFT mount?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|