Hmm.. Bill, all things considered, 21mm and 28mm are still
reasonably close to each other, if one considers a rather
minimalist kit of doubling focal lengths.
But it's such a personal thing. 24mm is probably my favourite
focal length. To be honest, I only bought my 21/2 to replace
(well, I still have it) very worn 24/2 - I would have been happy
with a mint 24/2 - but got a good deal on the 21mm.
21mm is a lot more difficult to use correctly, and I do prefer the
shallower DOF possible with a 24mm f/2 for many shots.
Dawid
On 25 Aug 2010, at 6:09 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> Nick,
>
> Never owned the 24/2, but I have both the 21/2 and the 28/2 and in
> film they
> were the two standbys for me. I can't imagine replacing them with
> any 24, as
> I consider them to be bad comprimises. Good choice on your part.
>
> Bill Pearce
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|