Re: [OM] OM wides (21/2, et al)

[Chuck Norcutt]

And if you look closely you will find that many if not most of these 
cases are actually testing different lenses.  It's certainly unlikely 
that the admittedly greater vibration in the OM-1 shots improved 
performance over the pre-fire cases.  But at least it certainly didn't 
destroy the performance of what might have been a better sample.

(skeptical) Chuck (show me the data) Norcutt


Brian Swale wrote:
> This morning I had another good look at Gary Reese's lens tests, and now i 
> have to say that I apologise for being so dogmatic about hem to Chuck (and 
> Olympus).
> 
> Yes, for the lenses under ? 135mm, there are actually some where the OM1 
> with mirror lock-up did better than the OM4T with mirror lock-up and 
> aperture prefire.
> 
> I'm not sure why I was so convinced that the OM1 was so useless, but now I 
> see that that is not necessarily so.
> 
> Brian Swale.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/