Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OM), yes, real OM for a change

Subject: Re: [OM] (OM), yes, real OM for a change
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:55:10 -0400
Hmmm.  I missed the 170mm close-up lens.  I thought it wasn't in the
eSIF but see it's considered part and parcel of the 80mm macro and is
only listed there.  Its not with the other close-up lenses.

I also overlooked the apo designation.  Yes, two elements is achromatic. 
  It take 3 elements to be apochromatic.  Achromats attempt to bring red 
and blue (the two ends of the spectrum) to a common focus.  Apochromats 
do that as well as bringing green (more like the center of the spectrum) 
to a common focus.  Achromats are common as objectives in refracting 
telescopes but the color performance is such that they usually have to 
be fairly long focal length and about f/15 to work well.  Apochromats 
are available for faster lenses... at astronomical prices.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt


Moose wrote:
> On 9/3/2010 1:59 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> I didn't realize the FL of the screw -in diopter.  I don't think it
>> is a 2 element apo design.  I don't think Dean was thrilled with
>> the results.
> 
> Two element. <http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/closeups.html>
> 
> As it says, though, I believe 2 element is acro, not apo. Not even
> sure if such designations are meaningful in context, as the lenses
> they are put in front of are usually not apochromatic.
> 
> I wouldn't mind having one, but have probably not looked very hard.
> 
> I have the iS/L Lens A-Macro  and B-Macro, but have seldom used them
> what with the true macro lenses lying about.
> 
> Moose
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz