I was giving you feedback. Reject it if you like.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/11/2010 5:45 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> I don't have any problem with the ads nor with your own articles. My
>> comment about being too tedious to read was specific to Khen's rambling,
>> rambling, rambling article on the E-5. Two pages would have been more
>> than adequate to say what needed to be said.
>
>
> 9400 words too long?
>
> Tell you what. Here is the Cliff Notes version:
>
> 1. Olympus is clueless
>
> 2. E-5 is late to market, as usual
>
> 3. Too little, too late
>
> 4. Best Olympus digital so far, but sucks in comparison to the
> competition's full-frame offerings
>
> 5. Regardless of what YOU think, Olympus knows better than you
>
> 6. If you like it, you'll buy it and be ecstatic about it.
>
> 7. Expect unending complaining and moaning from those of us that are
> stuck in yesterday's mud.
>
> 8. There is something creative and new about it, but those using the
> competition will poo-poo it and say it doesn't matter--just like
> people did with the sensor-cleaning, image-stabilization...
>
> Does that just about include everything? Or is that just my own grouse list?
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|