I thought you mean Color Negative :-) Thanks for the agreement.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
> Meant CH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Pearce [mailto:bs.pearce@xxxxxxx]
>
> Asusual, CN gets it right.
>
> Bill Pearce
>
> There is only one aspect film is better than digital, it is capture
> D-range
> and only happen with negative film. To me there is no reason to go back to
> slide.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Irisarri" <zuiko3000@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>>I have tried almost everything to scan the slides perfectly sharp. :)
>>but the best results were dividing the slides in cells and stitching
>>all of them.
>> Nikon LS-4000 gives you drum scan quality. DOF is extremelly narrow
>>but is sharper than Canon FS4000. I would never use negative if I had
>>to come back to analog photography. I got the best results with
>>Velvia 50 and Ektachrome T-grain slides.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> 2010/9/18 C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>> Focus problem virtually not exist with film strap, today if I have to
>>> shoot film it will be negative. BTW, most of my late slides were not
>>> mounted.
>>> Film
>>> flatness problem not only started with scanner, it long exist since
>>> the slide projection age.
>>>
>>> C.H.Ling
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Bill Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On 9/18/2010 1:25 PM, David Irisarri wrote:
>>> >> Scanning is useless. You never get corner-to-corner sharpness scans.
>>> > What David needs is a drum scanner with wet mounting.
>>> >
>>> > Billl Pearce
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|