Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Update on the Buick story, was: No one caught my stupid error,

Subject: Re: [OM] Update on the Buick story, was: No one caught my stupid error, was: GH2 specs! wow!!!
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:07:42 -0400
Sorry, I forgot to answer the Buick model question.  It's a Lucerne CXL 
with 4.6 liter Cadillac Northstar V8.  Goes like a bat out of hell but 
still manages to deliver 23.5 mpg at 70 mph with the A/C running.  It's 
quieter and smoother riding than the '99 Chrysler LHS but, on the other 
hand, trunk room, handling, seating comfort and some of the amenities of 
a luxury car are no match for the Chrysler.  I would still prefer the 
Chrysler as an over-the-road car if it didn't have 106,000 miles on it 
vs. the 36,000 on the Buick.  I wish I could buy a brand new 1999 
Chrysler LHS.  I think when I get back to Florida I'll look around for 
an un-rusted, low mileage 2001 model (the last year they were built).

Chuck Norcutt


On 9/21/2010 8:53 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> They haven't actually replaced the wheels yet.  They have to order them
> but will do so.
>
> I rotate the tires for exactly the opposite reason that you don't rotate
> them.  I do want to replace all four at the same time.  I consider it
> important for handling and braking safety that all four tires be the
> same brand and type and have even tread wear.
>
> Furthermore, if I were to get 60,000 miles on a set (as I have come to
> expect), with my reduced annual mileage after retirement and moving out
> of the Boston area, the tires may very well "age out" by turning brittle
> before reaching their mileage potential.  The '99 Chrysler LHS (my
> favorite) is now our local driving car and only gets about 6,000
> miles/year now... down from 12-15,000.  The Buick is our over the road
> car for long distance traveling and only gets local driving when we're
> in Florida for the winter.  It's averaging around 9,000 miles/year so
> even its tires could possibly "age out" before the tread is gone.
>
> If I was smarter I'd probably cut down to one car as both are rarely
> used at the same time.  But I'm not sure how my wife would take to that.
>    Well, considering that, maybe does make me the smarter man. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> The Buick is a 2006 Lucerne
>
> On 9/21/2010 1:03 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> I'm glad that you've had the wheels replaced, Chuck.  What Buick is
>> it, and why do you want to rotate the tyres?
>>
>> I used to move the tyres around the car until I realised that it
>> would probably mean that I would have to change them all at once.
>> Now, my major task is to find tyres that are run-flats that will last
>> longer than 17,000 miles . . .
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 21 Sep 2010, at 00:49, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks.  As I was driving away I was wondering to myself if I'd
>>> have been as lucky on the wheels if I didn't also have the tire
>>> complaint at the same time.
>>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz