Maybe the reason for giving up on the 100mm macro is that Sigma already
produces a four thirds 105/2.8 1:1 macro.
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/460536-USA/Sigma_257107_105mm_f_2_8_EX_Macro.html>
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/21/2010 3:01 AM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
>
> So what lenses do list members feel are missing from the current offerings ?
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>
>> jjohnso4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> You'd think they'd at least finish the 100mm macro if that's the only
>>> one on the roadmap yet to be built.
>>
>> But, if that's the only 4/3s lens that people were wanting/expecting
>> then it doesn't seem like that big of a deal does it? He did say that
>> development of new 4/3s bodies would continue - I guess until the m4/3
>> product has matured to the point that it can, for all purposes, replace
>> the DSLR line.
>>
>> Later,
>> Johnny
>> ------------------
>> Johnny Johnson
>> Cleveland, GA
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> ...Wayne
>
> Wayne Harridge
>
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|