ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT

Subject:	Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:42:59 -0500

>
> :-)  Don't get me started, Piers.  How about "literally" for a word abused
> (almost) beyond usefulness?
>

Figuratively speaking, you are correct. But literally? Not so much.

:)

AG pedantic Schnozz
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, (continued) Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Charles Geilfuss Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Jim Couch Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, siddiq@xxxxxxx Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, siddiq@xxxxxxx Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Jan Steinman Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Jan Steinman

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] More Memory (OT), Ken Norton
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] More Memory (OT), Chuck Norcutt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, Chris Barker
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Lensbaby fot MfT, siddiq@xxxxxxx
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]