Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 24/2 vs 21/2 vs 24/2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 24/2 vs 21/2 vs 24/2.8
From: usher99@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:05:38 -0400
AG writes:
"Well, this discussion of wide-angle primes has me thinking about a 
couple of
things. First of all, since I am a hybrid digital and film shooter, 
whatever
lenses I have must work well on either system. The OM 35/2.8 tends to 
be a
little better for digital than the 35/2 because of the central hot-spot
issue common with the 35/2 lens. However, on film, the 35/2 is almost 
always
superior to the lowly 2.8 version."


First I've heard of this hot spot--wonder if that is a similar issue as 
the Tam 90 2.5 macro on digital.

Mike
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz