I had a 24/2.8 MC, it was before the digital age, I made a quick dirty test
to compare it with my 24/2, they were very close with the 24/2.8 a little
cool in color. Under the 5D II, 21/2 and 24/2 are very close in resolution.
The 21/2 has very high resolution, I don't think any lens will give obvious
better result.
There was not much people mentioned about the 28-48, I did posted a few
times here after getting the 5D II, it performs better than all zooms I have
tested near that range including the Tamron SP 24-48 and SP 35-80. It
possess high sharpness and resolution, a great travel lens, I wish it is a
24-48.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx>
>I came back form a short trip to find this, and I have both the 21/2 and
>the
> 24/2.8. The 21/2 is a really fablous lens, but I can't say if it is
> "better" than the 24/28, but I prefer it. My last go-to kit with the OM
> and
> film was the 21/2, the 28-48 (much underrated) and the 85/2. I won't ever
> get rid of the 21 EVER!!!
>
> Bill Pearce
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|