Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 24/2 vs 21/2 vs 24/2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] 24/2 vs 21/2 vs 24/2.8
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:08:08 +0800
The 28-48 was a low cost lens, I would pay double if they make it 24-48, may 
be the extra cost can compensate for the increased range and still maintain 
the same quality :-)

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> But if it was a 24-48 it probably wouldn't be so sharp!  :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 10/26/2010 4:42 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> I had a 24/2.8 MC, it was before the digital age, I made a quick dirty 
>> test
>> to compare it with my 24/2, they were very close with the 24/2.8 a little
>> cool in color. Under the 5D II, 21/2 and 24/2 are very close in 
>> resolution.
>> The 21/2 has very high resolution, I don't think any lens will give 
>> obvious
>> better result.
>>
>> There was not much people mentioned about the 28-48, I did posted a few
>> times here after getting the 5D II, it performs better than all zooms I 
>> have
>> tested near that range including the Tamron SP 24-48 and SP 35-80. It
>> possess high sharpness and resolution, a great travel lens, I wish it is 
>> a
>> 24-48.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz