Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al]

Subject: Re: [OM] Reminiscing [was: Re: iPhone et al]
From: Charles Geilfuss <charles.geilfuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:21:06 -0400
  I have to agree as well. Seems silly to give the same rights as a living
person to a corporate entity that can be bought, sold or taken over with
hostility. I don't believe the Constitution would have to be amended though
to correct this; the Supreme Court would have to simply reverse the ruling.
I won't hold my breath.

Charlie

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

> It was actually "Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad"
> (1996).  Now I'm in real danger.  I've discovered that I'm not only in
> agreement with Jan on this point but also with Al Gore.  This is too
> much.  :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 11/5/2010 1:02 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
> > Santa Clara County vs Union Pacific
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz