Of course, because of the Rumsfeld corollary: We don't know what we
don't know. I knew that all along... or did I?
Chuck Norcutt (I think that's who I am)
On 11/7/2010 7:21 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> My view was very broad because of the agency I worked for and the
> particular job I had in particular parts of the world. As a young man
> I had a hell of a time dancing merrily through all sorts of Top
> Secret documents that would turn your blood cold if you knew what was
> in them. And some of which would make you laugh like hell, which is
> one reason I enjoy it when the list turns political from time to
> time.
>
> Bob's Immutable Law of the Universe: Whatever you think you know, you
> don't.
>
> --Bob Whitmire www.bobwhitmire.com
>
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Even "Top Secret" doesn't get you access to anything but a small,
>> compartmentalized subset of Top Secret documents. Within the main
>> classification there are sub-classifications which are still
>> controlled on a need-to-know basis. My view of that universe was
>> very narrow. :-)
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|