Dint get the Moosemessage for some reason. I'd crop even more on the right to
increase intimacy and do something about that bottle top at the bottom
Beyond that I didn't understand any of the comment below Mike. '...a peanut
butter on cracker approach with blind deconvolution..' sounds like something
I'd do in the kitchen at 2am.
But then I'm a simple soul - can I have jam on the cracker too?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 08/12/2010, at 11:45 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Here's a rough idea of how it could be transformed.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Wajsman/PAW104807.htm>
>
>
>
> Another very interesting/instructive Moose image analysis. Thanks.
>
> No clue that the Moose uses deconvolution as a tool. I believe Focus
> Magic uses a peanut butter spread on cracker approach with
> blind deconvolution assuming a gaussian PSF---still works well
> especially in this situation where general defocus blur is to be
> reduced for the alternative view. Works well in astrophotography
> apparently as it is a very good assumption for atmospheric effects
> --gaussian blur with largish radius. I believe DXO does the
> deconvolution on the separate RGB channels and is context aware. Noise
> seems to cause great indigestion for deconvolution and I believe focus
> Magic reduces it no matter what. I am not sure,but despite a stable
> full of optics Ph.D's DXO could no way quickly crank out lens module
> after lens module with lens specific PSF, though aberration corrections
> clearly are carefully done---even to the point of focus distance
> specific aberration correction when possible.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|