All valid observations. It's a shame they haven't been able to come up
with some device to effectively immobilize someone in a non-injurious
manner. Too bad this device didn't work better:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/02/foam-based-vehi/
Charlie
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because when an officer does dicharge his/her weapon, the
> determination has already been made that the situation is deadly and
> just wounding the assailant has a lower rate of success in actually
> stopping the assailant from succeeding.
>
> AG (Tazers on stun) Schnozz
>
> --
> Ken Norton
> ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.zone-10.com
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|