Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/12/2010: the Puerto Rico that few tourists see

Subject: Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/12/2010: the Puerto Rico that few tourists see
From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 08:23:31 -0500
Sounds like you haven';t seen or heard anything about it, really.

___________________________________
John Hermanson  |   CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121  |  www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html

On 1/4/2011 5:33 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Why? It's all in the name. My friend the chef chemically separates meat from 
> chicken carcasses because he hasn't got time to pick at them nor can afford 
> to waste them. He does this by the refined and very advanced technique of 
> boiling them in salted water to make stock and soup. :-)
> I could be pedantic (who, me?) and point out that removing meat from the bone 
> with a knife is 'mechanical'. So is ripping it off by hand, in some sense.
> I seem to remember that mechanical separation of chicken is done on carcasses 
> after the breast and leg/thigh sections have been sliced off. I understood 
> that some sort of centrifuging was involved. Because a lot of small bones 
> like ribs are still in there, it is then converted to a paste and cooked to 
> 'manufactured' meat found in chicken nuggets, sausages, sandwich loaf and so 
> on. I'd suggest that this product is possibly more healthy than regular 
> chicken from a fast food joint because (with the exception of nuggets) it 
> often hasn't been coated in batter and deep fried. It also contains 
> proportions of bone and bone marrow which are quite healthy products (ask any 
> dog) and high in calcium.
> Of course, like any minced product it requires some preservative because they 
> go bad quickly - the processing heats it slightly and the surface area is 
> immense. And of course it tastes foul. But it isn't necessarily any worse for 
> you than many other forms of meat, could be healthier in some ways and does 
> recover material that would otherwise be wasted or devalued as animal feed.
>
> You are just responding squeamishly to the industrial style nomenclature.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 05/01/2011, at 1:06 AM, John Hermanson wrote:
>
>> Speaking of fast food, have you ever read about "mechanically separated"
>> chicken used in some chicken nuggets?  MacDonalds doesn't do this, but
>> this type of "food" should be illegal.
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz