Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Cambridge Botanical Gardens

Subject: Re: [OM] Cambridge Botanical Gardens
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:49:16 +0000
I don't, Chuck.  The background looks fine to me.

But I'm happy to take it as a difference in appreciation :-)

Chris

On 11 Jan 2011, at 16:06, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> Chuck's opinion is that a blown out "unimportant background" will 
> suddenly become important since it's blown out.  Keeping the unimportant 
> background unimportant should be one of the goals of the photograph. 
> That's also why I consider the edgy bokeh to be a problem as well.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> On 1/11/2011 7:38 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
>  the "powder Puff plant;
>> my preference would have been to expose correctly on the flower ( had I
>> noticed the problem at the time, which is doubtful), and let the unimportant
>> background  blow out. The bokeh there isn't much of a problem.
> -- 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz