Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Cambridge Botanical Gardens

Subject: Re: [OM] Cambridge Botanical Gardens
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 07:53:02 +0000
I like the result, Moose, but . . .

1.  You remove the dappling of the water's reflections of light on the bridge.
2.  My car has gone :-)

Chris

On 12 Jan 2011, at 05:45, Moose wrote:

> On 1/11/2011 5:30 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> . . . For instance, the Packhorse Bridge does have quite a range of 
>> brightnesses, but it's manageable for me (i.e. I like it :-)).  If you have 
>> time you might wish to see that image on Picasaweb:
>> 
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/vc-9CklBq2D23_vG8tRDAedxpYFNEeSAmNLIvDuRXhs?feat=directlink
>> 
>> . . . and see if it still shows the problems you hint at.  All the latest 
>> images on that blog are on that album.
>> 
>> I should be interested in your thoughts (or anyone else's if they have the 
>> time).
> 
> Hey, tough lighting, but even in the JPEG, very little lost, I imagine the 
> slightly blown highlights might be 
> recoverable in RAW processing.
> 
> I do prefer it with the mid tones and upper shadows lifted and the brightest 
> highlights toned down a bit. Also without 
> the car and sign. :-)
> - <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Barker/Packhorse_Bridge.htm>
> 
> As usual, if the treatment is too much, imagine something in between.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz