Re: [OM] Bokeh question

[Andrew Fildes]

Except that everything is not in focus - just apparently so. Which means that 
the areas just off focus will be rendered in a particular way which may be what 
gives a particular lens its character - so how about we invent the term 
'micro-bokeh' and start a whole new area of lensgeek discourse? :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 17/01/2011, at 11:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> Agreed.  The definition of bokeh relates to the appearance of 
> out-of-focus parts of the image.  If everything is in focus there is no 
> bokeh.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/