Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Bokeh question

Subject: Re: [OM] Bokeh question
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:59:36 -0500
But "apparently so" is reality for in focus.  If the CoC is so small 
that you can't see the Airy disc then all of the image is in focus and 
you can't see any of the "micro-bokeh" you purport to exist.

Chuck Norcutt


On 1/17/2011 4:07 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Except that everything is not in focus - just apparently so. Which
> means that the areas just off focus will be rendered in a particular
> way which may be what gives a particular lens its character - so how
> about we invent the term 'micro-bokeh' and start a whole new area of
> lensgeek discourse? :-) Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 17/01/2011, at 11:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Agreed.  The definition of bokeh relates to the appearance of
>> out-of-focus parts of the image.  If everything is in focus there
>> is no bokeh.
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz