ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7

Subject:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7
From:	Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:58:09 +0000

Subject:

Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7

From:

Date:

Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:58:09 +0000

Thanks, Nick.

Chris

On 31 Jan 2011, at 16:20, Nicholas Herndon wrote:

> Yep, the colors match and everything!
> Olympus had better hit a home run with their rumored 25mm m4/3rds lens,
> because that Panny is a real hum-dinger.  It's made me (temporarily) forget
> about film.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Panny 20/1.7, Nicholas Herndon Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chris Barker <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Pani 20 on Olympus (maybe E-PL2), Chris Barker
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31, Chris Barker
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Panny 20/1.7, Nicholas Herndon
Next by Thread:	[OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31, Jan Steinman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Previous by Date:

Re: [OM] Pani 20 on Olympus (maybe E-PL2), Chris Barker

Next by Date:

Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31, Chris Barker

Previous by Thread:

[OM] Panny 20/1.7, Nicholas Herndon

Next by Thread:

[OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31, Jan Steinman

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]