Can the touch screen not be disabled?
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/19/2011 1:20 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> It's OK, and one cannot have it all. The touch screen on the GH2 is a
> deal killer for me. He mentions how you inadvertently can end up
> focusing, changing settings etc. when you have the camera around your
> neck and the buttons touch the back of the camera. I have a deep
> dislike of touch screens; I tolerate the one on the iPhone because
> the device is otherwise so good and useful, but I would not want it
> on my camera.
>
> Cheers, Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK:
> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:02 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Hmm, Didn't think the EVF on the Panny was that good. Don't recall
>> Nathan much liking it. Mike
>>
>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/panasonic_gh2_revisited.shtml
>>
>>
--
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|