I'd have thought that any appreciable coma (obvious in the small scale
of star images) would have been visible as at least slight distortions
in the corners pointing back to the center of the field. Am I incorrect?
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/22/2011 9:45 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> I do agree with Chuck that you cannot tell much from a web image of
> that size, but the image DOES illustrate the uniformity the 35/2.8 OM
> Zuiko has. From my own personal experience with this lens, I'd say
> that the displayed image is representative of my own results.
>
> There is coma with this lens, but it is not going to be very visible
> in that image size. Overall, the lens is a winner and as I've said
> before, it would be my last Zuiko standing. It, and my 100/2.8 are my
> dying grasp lenses.
>
> AG
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|