Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?

Subject: Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:37:20 -0500
I love "Pontificating" (3rd image down on the first page)

Chuck Norcutt


On 2/23/2011 10:47 AM, Nicholas Herndon wrote:
> Ken, I'm glad you said that about the 35/2.  I always heard about its
> poor performance, then decided to try it myself.  It is in fact a
> stunning performer.  I bought a copy from John H, then sold it to a
> friend and quickly regretted it.  He just recently sold it back to me.
>   Here's a shot I took with it recently (first image in my stream):
> www.flickr.com/pooroldpunch (OM-4T, Portra 400NC, handheld at f2.8 or
> f4).  Bokeh on this lens can be busy at times, but usually not too
> distracting. One very interesting observation: in the Olympus OM
> System Handbook, a large percentage of the published images were with
> the 35/2.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz