That's the first time that you've explained it in those terms, Moose: the
difference between your eyes rather than an overall excellence of vision (or at
least the first time that I've read it that way. It's very interesting.
On 23 Feb 2011, at 05:54, Moose wrote:
>> As is sometimes the case when I look at your images I still think that some
>> are a tiny bit over-sharpened:
>
> No, I don't think it has to do with the camera, as you speculated below. As
> I've noted before, I have 20/20 vision in my
> left eye and 20/10 in the right. That means I simply see the world a bit
> differently than the vast majority of people.
> When I'm out in nature and occasionally cover my right eye, I'm amazed at the
> soft edged view most folks have.
>
> So when I'm sharpening images, and trying to create something like what I
> saw, I tend to over sharpen. I know that at
> the resolution of web images, there just aren't enough pixels to get the
> effect I want. But some sharpening is mostly
> needed at presentation size, and it's easy for me to overdo it. I try to
> remember to back off a bit after doing it to my
> taste. :-)
Thank you :-)
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|