Well, I'm not gonna get into the film/digital debate here either, but it's
clear the subject is well suited to Black & White. I'd say, however, that
shooting film for scanning is going to "force" you into more depth of post
processing than you seem comfortable with. Nature of the beast. <g>
--Bob
On Mar 22, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> My PAW in week 8 started with a picture of an abandoned bar with a very
> dramatic sky:
> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws/?page_id=494
>
> I also had my "Texas Leica", the Fuji 6x9 rangefinder with me, and shot a
> couple of images with that as well. The negatives arrived back from the lab
> yesterday, and I scanned them this morning. This is what the same scene looks
> on Tri-X:
> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/4253606_netUM#1225220494_miVXG-O-LB
>
> I must admit I am not too much into the film vs. digital debate, but I know
> which of these two images I like best. Both are relatively unprocessed,
> except that the film image was taken with a red filter.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|