I'm not sure if I came across right. I was meaning to say that noting
the aesthetics of that object (E-P2) was not something fully rational
about my choice, except that I rationally understood my irrationality
when I made it. :) I didn't mean to suggest that my subjectivity about
an object, a device's form, was any "better" than another person's. I
kind of meant the opposite. You could put *my* choice in that area
down to "Oh, shiny!". :) But, to me, it's only *subjectively*
"shinier" (not by much) than the E-PL2, not "better".
Also, I do like the VF-2 - I hope you do too. I also hope you get the
same affection from this Olympus Pen form that I do.
And I look forward to your photos too.
Cheers,
Marc
On Monday, 4 April 2011, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I did understood what you were saying - However I ended up ordering the
> E-PL2 double lens kit in black and also a separate vf-2 locally from
> switzerland. I may still get an E-P2 because of aesthetics but the two
> lens E-PL2 kit coupled with the 7-14 should see me okay for a while or
> until the E-P3, but to be honest I have paid a lot more in the past for
> lenses than an E-P2 body would cost, they are also lot cheaper than the
> single digit E-x series cameras.
>
> I look forward to more of your images.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|