I suspect that CH might be correct about the focusing problem. When
used on the E510 you're only using the central portion of the image
which should be very good. Try it on your OMs before discarding it.
Chuck Norcutt
On 4/13/2011 1:50 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> These images show how my OM 24/2 performs with 5D II, I'm rather happy with
> it.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_1308_24F2atF2.JPG
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_1309_24F2atF4.JPG
>
> Sharpness setting "0" (with the 5D II it means no sharpen applied)
>
> At normal distance OM 24/2 and 24/2.8 are having similar performance, at
> close distance the 24/2 do better with its close focus correction mechanism.
> With a E510, the focus is very difficulty due to small viewfinder, it might
> account for the poor performance.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ch. Zhou"<perimeterbow@xxxxxxx>
>
>
>> I often heard that this lens is an outstanding performer, even wide open.
>>
>> I saw mixed wide open pictures by this lens, some are really
>> outstanding, some are mediocre.
>>
>> I recently acquired one. Mounted on my Olympus E-510 digital camera, it
>> does not perform well enough wide open to meet my expectation. I am
>> wondering what your experience is with this lens. Do I happen to get a
>> bad copy?
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
