I would go for a digital Xpan, but likely it would not be a full frame. It
was definitely a fun camera. Only problem for me was scanning the results.
I imagine that the cost of the M9 is due in no small part to sensor costs,
as there are relatively few sold. With a digital xpan, it would be even
worse.
For scanning, I got a Minolta Multi-Pro, which is a great scanner. I also
modified a negative holder for the Omega 4x5 enlarger and had a local lab do
prints, which were unbelievable.
Bill Pearce
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|