Re: [OM] Oh, I forgot to mention...

[Chuck Norcutt]

Sounds like unnecessary work to me.  I seems to me that whatever 
tonality is visible on the paper is inherent in the image and that the 
scanning/post-processing should be able to reproduce it without making 
an intervening print.  Am I wrong?  You must think so.

Chuck Norcutt


On 4/18/2011 6:00 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Sounds interesting.  I can't wait to hear all the details.
>
> In due time.
>
>
>> Want to give us more detail on how one scans a projected image?
>
> I guess I wasn't very clear... surprise surprise.
>
> I'd make working prints in the darkroom and then scan them on a
> bog-standard Canon flatbed reflective scanner using VueScan. Then the
> image gets further tweaked as necessary, but the major tonality stuff
> is done in the darkroom. Paper will be RC non-glossy surface.
>
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/