> This topic was discussed some 3 years ago ... it's time to revisit it,
> Me too, I've forgotten the definition of what a 'normal' lens is ;-)
A "normal" lens is one which isn't too wide, nor too long.
Everybody has their own specific aesthetic as to what that is, but
generally speaking it comes out to around the equivalent of 40-55mm in
35mm film format.
Another way of looking at it is that a "normal" lens is the most
boring focal-length. It's neither wide, nor telephoto. It doesn't
include enough background to give environmental shots, but it's not
selective enough to declutter. Some may consider the "normal" lens to
be the most worthless of all lenses. In fact, I went for a number of
years without one. The only advantage the "normal" lens has for me is
that it's the brightest lens I have. Other than that, it's usually the
last lens I grab.
Unless, of course, I want to exploit the optical traits for artistic intent.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|