Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal"

Subject: Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal"
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 06:47:19 -0400
FWIW, 

http://www.bobwhitmire.com/acadianationalpark.html

The last shot in the gallery, Bee Hive 2, is at an aspect ratio of 16:9. The 
actual image dimensions are 10x18 inches.

--Bob


On May 12, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Brian Swale wrote:

> Bob W wrote
>> I wonder if
>> the 16:9 aspect ration will begin to emerge as a preferred ratio for
>> photographic prints? I've done a couple that way, and I have to admit
>> they're rather pleasing to the eye.
> 
> So long as they don't include the distortion I see all too often when I 
> (rarely) 
> see TV here on the new wide screens; every body and face is squidged out 
> to fat/wide and correct horizontal  proportions are totally lost.. 
> It's amazing; regular viewers don't seem to notice/care, but. (To incorporate 
> some Australian slang which puts the word "but" at the end of many 
> sentences).
> 
> Brian Swale. 
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz